Skip to content

Ignorant and unreasonable

"Daily" news about the ignorant and or unreasonable

Recent Posts

  • Elon Musk Doesn’t Understand English Very Well, Thinks Nazis Are OK Guys, Or Both – Dealbreaker
  • Police Arrested A 10 Year Old For Peeing Behind His Mom’s Car
  • Scott Galloway Locked Out of Twitter, Claims Foul Play
  • Border Patrol Caging Migrants Outside in Deadly Arizona Heatwave
  • Elon Musk openly tells his 121 million followers to follow QAnon | Boing Boing

Recent Comments

  • Amber Bosma on Worthy of Contempt: Ohio Judge Tim Grendell Abuses His Office To Suppress Criticism
  • Sheila J Stauffer on Worthy of Contempt: Ohio Judge Tim Grendell Abuses His Office To Suppress Criticism
  • moz on Apartment Complex Claims Copyright Of Tenants’ Reviews And Photos, Charges $10k Fee For Criticism
  • muffinki on “Deadly Heat” in U.S. Prisons Is Killing Inmates and Spawning Lawsuits
  • Anonymous on 1-star Yelp review says “Gordy” the pet fish was overfed, attracts $1M lawsuit | Ars Technica

Archives

  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • September 2022
  • January 2022
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014

Categories

  • Awesomeness
  • Brilliance from kickstarter
  • Censorship
  • Copyright
  • Homeopathy
  • Human stupidity
  • Ignorant or unreasonable
  • Lobbying
  • Net Neutrality
  • Patents
  • Police
  • Pure genius
  • Site news
  • Spying
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized
  • War

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Tag: Matthijs R. Koot

Dutch Court Sets Aside National Data Retention Law

Back in January, we wrote about a legal challenge to the Netherlands’ data retention law by a group of civil rights organizations. This was because the Dutch government had decided to ignore the important ruling by Europe’s highest court, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU), that blanket data retention was “invalid.” Now, a court in The Hague has ruled the government was wrong to do so:

Dutch providers are no longer required to retain internet and phone traffic data. The telecommunications data retention law, that was fought in court by various privacy groups and small ISPs, is invalid.

That was ruled by the court of The Hague on Wednesday. The data retention law violated the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, specifically regarding the right to protection of private life and protection of personal data.

As that report from Nu.nl, translated by Matthijs R. Koot on his blog, makes clear, the court’s judgment affects all kinds of telecoms — both Internet and phone traffic data — and all communication providers. This is the judge’s reasoning:

The judge finds that the collected data are too easily accessible for crimes that are not serious. The plaintiffs stated that, technically, theft of a bicycle could lead to access to data, although the government stated this does not happen.

“Fact of the matter is that the possibility exists and that no safeguards exist to limit access to the data to what is strictly necessary to fight (only) serious crime”, according to the judge.

The court also finds it to be incorrect that no prior court approval is needed to access the data.

The judge’s ruling is only “provisonally enforeable”, and the Dutch government may appeal against it. But even if it does, it has a larger problem with its policy in this area. Although it claims a new data retention bill will be compatible with the CJEU ruling, the Netherlands’ Data Protection Authority has already said that it is still too intrusive for a number of reasons. Clearly, the European debate over what is a reasonable and proportionate level of data retention — if any — has a long way to go yet, both in the Netherlands and elsewhere.

Link (Techdirt)

Posted on March 12, 2015Categories Human stupidity, Ignorant or unreasonable, SpyingTags Court of Justice of the EU, Data Retention, EU, Matthijs R. Koot, Metadata, Netherlands, Nu.nlLeave a comment on Dutch Court Sets Aside National Data Retention Law
Proudly powered by WordPress
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.